You must login to post a comment. Don't have an account? Register to get one!

• 

  • Reply
  • #5

  Kasc Apr 24, 2015 at 23:57 UTC - 0 likes

  @andar1l: Go

  I don't think thats a good idea. It's much better to know the actual HP rather than attempt to assume what people might want to know after a wipe. People can use WCL for that kind of deep analysis.

• 

  • Reply
  • #4

  funkydude Mar 22, 2015 at 22:36 UTC - 0 likes

  Some people have suggested ways to improve it. Just consider this ticket not being closed as a good sign. :p

• 

  • Reply
  • #3

  andar1l Mar 22, 2015 at 21:14 UTC - 0 likes

  @funkydude: Go

  How about check alive persent of raiders, and then 15-18 members of 20 are dead just snapshot boss hp?
  Or it will be too resource-intensive?

• 

  • Reply
  • #2

  Breadwinka Feb 09, 2015 at 21:26 UTC - 0 likes

  Makes sense, that's a lot of overhead and extra coding that's not necessary thanks for the reply.

• 

  • Reply
  • #1

  funkydude Feb 09, 2015 at 03:07 UTC - 1 like

  It sounds like a simple addition, but it isn't. Adding this would actually be pretty complicated. It would involve constantly checking and saving the boss health so that you can display it when you wipe (since the boss has despawned, you can't access the health pool).

  Then you need custom code for every encounter that involves multiple bosses, and deciding how that percentage should be displayed e.g. as a whole, individually, etc.